ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCIAL VARIABLE
Pierangelo Dacrema
Professor of Economics at the
The purpose of this speech is to
focus the attention on the relationship between economic development and
financial variable, that is on the role that the
financial variable has in the economic development
processes.
The speech consists of three parts.
In the first part, the introductory one, I will look at the topic
from an historical point of view.
I will try therefore to shortly recall the experiences of some countries
in order to highlight if, when and where the
financial variable has turned out crucial for the development.
In the second part I want to develop - in a canonical way - the
topic associated with the relationship between
economic development and financial variable.
This part will be the core of the speech and in order to conduct it I will also use some theoretical
instruments useful to
demonstrate that exists a direct relationship among development, risk and financial variable.
In the third part of the speech I will demonstrate, using a
methodology based on some examples, the limits
of financial variable and I will draw some conclusions on the secondary role
that it can assume if it is not accompanied, and in some cases preceded, by a
very strong decisional fact, by
the gesture that gives a sense to financial variable itself.
The historiography of the western economy is rich of
examples that remind us of the importance of
financial variable for the development of the economic systems, but it is equally rich of examples that go in the opposite
direction.
The most famous example in this last sense, and
perhaps also the most important, is the case of
An example that goes in the opposite direction is the
case of
Compared with the case of England the cause-effect
relationship is reversed in the case of Italy:
while in England the industrial development (happened aside from financial
variable and, therefore, from the
participation of the banks) has determined the development of the financial
superstructure, in Italy the financial superstructure has permitted the
industrial development by supplying
capital and funds for it.
F = TOTAL BROKERAGED FUNDS
R = RISK
S =
Before going through the core of the speech it is
necessary to clarify what we mean for financial
institutions and financial intermediaries. The meaning that we want to give in
this case is wide: anyone who hold financial variable, that
is any subject that, as a consequence of a delegated relationship, is called to transfer financial resources from
one or many subjects to others. So, the financial intermediary can be a very
typical subject (such as banks) as well as public agencies whose mission is
however to transfer and allocate financial resources.
Now we can pass thorugh the core of the
speech...
Increase and development of economic systems are
uneven ways, they are based on change. Any
change is risky, dangerous himself, because it is characterized from processes
with uncertain outcomes. The financial
institutions mission is to finance the change, by assuming themselves risk.
A graphical synthesis will help
us to highlight the relationship among the considerate variables, also by defining the right direction of them.
The only below hypothesis is that exists a typical constriction that is
very typical of the economic-financial
contexts; it consists of limited possibilities of exchange between subjects in
surplus and subjects in deficit because of the informational asymmetries that
make capital markets imperfect and
because of a series of other ties, logistic and administrative, that
prevent the conclusion of agreements between the primary counterparts
(stockbrokers).
The used concept of brokered funds is wide and it not only refers to the
credit intermediation but also to the participation of all the financial
intermediaries active on the market (therefore public agencies included) and that operate according to the logic of
delegated investor.
The risk concept, in a neutral meaning, refers to the phenomenon
associated with the collection and the investment of resources
(that can be represented from deposits in the case of the credit intermediation, from fiscal revenues (taxes) in the case
of the intermediation operated from
public agencies) intended to finance activities and ventures characterized from
a more or less uncertain outcome.
For development rate, we mean a general positive dynamic of a series of
economic indicators, firs of all gross domestic product.
The
figure shows the existence of a direct linear relation between risk and
financial variable and, therefore, between
risk and development.
Function R=aF
expresses the sensibility of R to the variations of F according to a parameter
a measuring the inclination of the line. The measure of a depends on many conditions such as the backwardness of the economic system, the spread and quality of the
entrepreneurship that distinguishes it, its degree of exposure to specific
economic conjunctures.
On the
other axis, function S=0R expresses the attitude of an economic system to grow
in function of the available
resources and therefore of the risk. P measures the ability of financial institutions in leading and managing resources for
achieving economic development. P is a synthetic expression of intermediaries' operational and allocative efficiency and their suitability
to carry out their mission that consists of being intelligent and effective
filter regarding of the financiable initiatives. If
the level of R is high this fact will affect S in a positive way: to a greater total risk, that directly
depends on financial variable, corresponds greater potentialities of development.
The model just examined can be useful to explain, form a theoretical
point of view, the existing relationship between financial
variable and economic development. From a logical point of view that could carry to identify the financial variable like
crucial factor of development. This
is true but not in an absolute sense.
The
financial variable can be necessary condition but for sure is not sufficient
condition for development of the economic
systems. In other words, so far we
have explained the potential of financial variable in the economic development, from now on I will try to emphasize
its limits... and now I am going to pass on the conclusion of my speech.
In order to demonstrate the limits of the financial
variable I will use three examples: the first example is the case of the City of
The City of
The second example it is the case of Calabria Region. Since
Well, both in 1994-99 and 2000-2003 period ,
This fact can be explained by a lack of ability in programming
development, in strategic thinking, and most
of all in turning ideas into action. The
example demonstrates as the availability of financial resources can reveal
useless in absence of capacity
of action.
The third example is the case of Ireland, country in
which the development has been possible thanks to a decisional and acting
ability that has been transformed in ability to expense by adequately (correctly) managing the financial
variable.
All the cited examples emphasize the difference that
exists between power of the money and power of the gesture: it is the gesture
that gives a sense to the money, it is the gesture that produces wealth, the money is
a following fact.